In the United States, the sick-care pharma shills have downplayed and falsified natural immunity data

In the United States, the sick-care pharma shills have downplayed and falsified natural immunity data

  • August 18, 2025

S.D Wells, News Target

In August 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) declared that vaccines offered greater protection against COVID-19 than prior infection. The agency based this claim on a Kentucky study but misrepresented its scope. The study had not concluded that vaccination was universally superior to natural immunity. Instead, it found that for people who had already been infected, vaccination could provide additional protection against reinfection. Nonetheless, the CDC’s press release framed the findings as evidence that vaccines were broadly more protective, a claim amplified by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Francis Collins in a televised interview.

Watchdog group Protect the Public’s Trust argues that the CDC and Collins misled the public by misrepresenting the Kentucky study and ignoring its limitations. Shortly afterward, internal communications show that officials, including Collins, Anthony Fauci, and Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, were made aware of an Israeli study with a starkly different conclusion. That study suggested that natural immunity provided stronger and longer-lasting protection against reinfection than two doses of mRNA vaccines. Internal emails show Fauci and Collins recognized the study’s robustness, with CDC scientist John Brooks praising its design and analysis. Brooks even admitted that infection-induced immunity might last longer than vaccine-induced immunity, particularly within the first six months.

Despite acknowledging these findings privately, officials concluded it would be “too costly” to change course and risk undermining the push for widespread vaccination. Instead, public messaging remained consistent: Vaccines were said to provide better protection than natural infection. Internal communications reveal that health officials believed acknowledging the Israeli study could discourage vaccination, even if the evidence supported natural immunity as stronger in some cases.

Read More